mirror of
https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/openwrt.git
synced 2026-01-28 01:17:30 +01:00
kernel: add preemption models
Introduce preemption model selection with PREEMPT_NONE as the default. PREEMPT_NONE is the traditional Linux preemption model and also the best choice for servers. Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@bootlin.com> Link: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/21413 Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
794b4dee65
commit
5d720117f7
1 changed files with 69 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -1492,3 +1492,72 @@ config KERNEL_WERROR
|
|||
and unusual warnings, or you have some architecture with problems,
|
||||
you may need to disable this config option in order to
|
||||
successfully build the kernel.
|
||||
|
||||
choice
|
||||
prompt "Preemption Model"
|
||||
default KERNEL_PREEMPT_NONE
|
||||
|
||||
config KERNEL_PREEMPT_NONE
|
||||
bool "No Forced Preemption (Server)"
|
||||
help
|
||||
This is the traditional Linux preemption model, geared towards
|
||||
throughput. It will still provide good latencies most of the
|
||||
time, but there are no guarantees and occasional longer delays
|
||||
are possible.
|
||||
|
||||
Select this option if you are building a kernel for a server or
|
||||
scientific/computation system, or if you want to maximize the
|
||||
raw processing power of the kernel, irrespective of scheduling
|
||||
latencies.
|
||||
|
||||
config KERNEL_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY
|
||||
bool "Voluntary Kernel Preemption (Desktop)"
|
||||
help
|
||||
This option reduces the latency of the kernel by adding more
|
||||
"explicit preemption points" to the kernel code. These new
|
||||
preemption points have been selected to reduce the maximum
|
||||
latency of rescheduling, providing faster application reactions,
|
||||
at the cost of slightly lower throughput.
|
||||
|
||||
This allows reaction to interactive events by allowing a
|
||||
low priority process to voluntarily preempt itself even if it
|
||||
is in kernel mode executing a system call. This allows
|
||||
applications to run more 'smoothly' even when the system is
|
||||
under load.
|
||||
|
||||
Select this if you are building a kernel for a desktop system.
|
||||
|
||||
config KERNEL_PREEMPT
|
||||
bool "Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)"
|
||||
help
|
||||
This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making
|
||||
all kernel code (that is not executing in a critical section)
|
||||
preemptible. This allows reaction to interactive events by
|
||||
permitting a low priority process to be preempted involuntarily
|
||||
even if it is in kernel mode executing a system call and would
|
||||
otherwise not be about to reach a natural preemption point.
|
||||
This allows applications to run more 'smoothly' even when the
|
||||
system is under load, at the cost of slightly lower throughput
|
||||
and a slight runtime overhead to kernel code.
|
||||
|
||||
Select this if you are building a kernel for a desktop or
|
||||
embedded system with latency requirements in the milliseconds
|
||||
range.
|
||||
|
||||
config KERNEL_PREEMPT_RT
|
||||
bool "Fully Preemptible Kernel (Real-Time)"
|
||||
depends on (x86_64 || aarch64 || riscv64)
|
||||
help
|
||||
This option turns the kernel into a real-time kernel by replacing
|
||||
various locking primitives (spinlocks, rwlocks, etc.) with
|
||||
preemptible priority-inheritance aware variants, enforcing
|
||||
interrupt threading and introducing mechanisms to break up long
|
||||
non-preemptible sections. This makes the kernel, except for very
|
||||
low level and critical code paths (entry code, scheduler, low
|
||||
level interrupt handling) fully preemptible and brings most
|
||||
execution contexts under scheduler control.
|
||||
|
||||
Select this if you are building a kernel for systems which
|
||||
require real-time guarantees.
|
||||
|
||||
endchoice
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue